US Treasury's Bessent Predicts Post-Iran War Oil Crash to $40 But Offers No Conflict Resolution Timeline

The Quick Take

• US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has predicted crude oil prices could collapse to $40 per barrel once the Iran conflict concludes, citing anticipated supply normalisation.
• Bessent did not specify a timeline for the war's conclusion, noting the conflict shows limited signs of ending in the near term.
• Current oil markets embed a significant conflict risk premium, meaning a peace resolution would trigger a major supply shock to the downside for crude prices.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent publicly predicted that crude oil prices could fall to approximately $40 per barrel following a potential resolution of the US-Iran military conflict, citing the expectation that Iranian oil supply previously constrained by sanctions and conflict-related disruptions would re-enter global markets. Bessent notably declined to specify any timeframe for the conflict's resolution, acknowledging that the conflict showed limited signs of near-term conclusion as of his statement. The $40 price target, if realised, would represent a dramatic decline from current market levels, implying a substantial deflationary impulse for energy-exposed economies globally.

Bessent's $40 oil prediction, if market participants begin to price for it, could compress valuations across upstream oil and gas equities, particularly companies priced on medium-term free cash flow assumptions tied to crude above $60 per barrel. Saudi Aramco, Exxon Mobil, and major OPEC+ producers whose fiscal break-even prices range from $70 to $90 per barrel would face fiscal stress scenarios if Bessent's thesis materialises. Conversely, global airlines, logistics companies, and energy-intensive manufacturers would benefit significantly from a sustained $40 oil environment, improving their operating cost structures and generating meaningful margin expansion.

The key forward signal is any US-Iran diplomatic progress — peace talks, ceasefire announcements, or back-channel negotiations — which would serve as the trigger for the supply-re-entry thesis underpinning Bessent's $40 prediction. Crude futures options market positioning, specifically the presence of large put options at strikes below $60, would indicate whether institutional hedgers are taking Bessent's forecast seriously. The macro variable that determines whether this thesis holds is OPEC+ response: the cartel has historically cut production to defend a price floor, and if Iran re-enters markets, Saudi Arabia and UAE may reduce output to offset supply increases and prevent a $40 crash scenario.

Synthesized from 1 source.